Introduction
For this week’s lab we started the complex task of creating
a good map for our navigation exercises in the weeks to come. While making a
map might sound like a simple and straightforward task there are a lot of tasks
that go into the process. We need this map to fulfill a few requirements: be
accurate enough to aid in our navigation, and to hold all necessary
topographical elements to prove useful.
Gathering the Data
The first part of this exercise was to get a pace count in
the real world to know how to best model our digital world in the GIS. To
attain a pace count, as a class we measured out a 100 meter long line on which
we measured our pace counts three times. We then found the average of each pace
count (mine was 64). This knowledge comes into play later in our navigation
exercise to help us measure distance without using any tools other than our own
legs.
After our pace count had been determined we worked in the
Lab to create a good map in our GIS. For the sake of time and efficiency our
professor was kind enough to provide the necessary data, but for the purpose of
this write up, I will detail where we could obtain this data had it not been
provided. Our professor provided a geodatabase that contained a few aerial
images of our study area, the Priory here in Eau Claire. These images could be
obtained from a clip of aerial photos we have on the ArcGIS server here on
campus, or from the USGS server. The geodatabase also contained 2foot contour
line DEM and a 5foot contour line DEM. The 2foot contour lines come from a
survey that UWEC undertook when the property was purchased. The 5foot contour
lines were taken from a USGS DEM server. The geodatabase also contained a few
simple shapefiles that outlined our study area.
Map Creation
Even though we were given all this packaged data, it does
not simply just make a nice map without any effort. I chose to use the 5foot
contour lines and make them thicker than they originally were, as well as apply
a maroon color so they wouldn’t stick out too much, but still be discernable
from the background. I then took an aerial image of the study area and put it
behind the contour lines. I set this aerial photo to a transparency of 45% so
it wouldn’t be the main focus of the map, but still remain readable. We decided
to add a grid system to the map so that we could have a solid frame of
reference that would fit with our coordinate system. We used the UTM grids and
made the numbers a bit clearer along the edges so they wouldn’t overlap at the
20 meter intervals we selected. After adding a few necessary cartographic
elements, north arrow, data sources, map author, key, and watermark, our maps
were finished and ready to aid in our navigation process.
Had we not been provided with all the necessary data there
would have been a few extra steps needed to be taken to create these maps. Each
larger image would need to be clipped and projected or reprojected in our
chosen coordinate system (UTM 15N) before we could begin to utilize it.
Map Selection
As a group we met and decided to use my map for the main
purpose of navigation during our outdoor exercise. However, we also decided to
have Brandon Schleicher’s 2foot contour map as another frame of reference. His
map gave more detail about elevation changes and terrain information. We chose
my map as a main navigation tool because it was clean, easy to read, and gave a
good balance of all the information without having any one element be
overpowering.
Final Maps
5Foot Countour Lines. Overlaid on Aerial Photos |
2Foot Contour Lines. Overlaid on a DEM showing terrain areas |
No comments:
Post a Comment